it's so well-groomed i'm trying not to mentioned the insignificant parts.
everyone's so growned up, Daniel Radcliffe aka Harry Potter's acting has definitely developed with the maturity of the character, Rupert Grint aka Ronald Weasley...he's sssssooooo damn cute!!...most probably cos i'm supposed to resemble him(which i will take it as a compliment, hmph!) and Emma Watson aka Hermione Granger looks as bitchy and stucked up as ever...*thumbsup!*
and i've got to mention...ROBERT PATTINSON IS FUCKING HOT!!!
playing cedric diggory...he didn't really appeal to me at first glance. i thought Stanislav Ianevski who plays Viktor Krum looked more fiery in the posters. and i now agree that good cameraman does help. That BULGARIAN is like a BIG, BULKY POTATO!!! he's supposed to be lean and lanky in the book if i'd not mistaken. but then he pulled off well. so he's forgiven. ;) looked vicious enough for a dumstranger. Michael Gambon sucked. TOTALLY indefensible!!! he made Professor Dumbledore such a lame old...coward! an utter disspointment. :(
he seemed to lose his head and direction everytime they face problems. appearing so agitated when Harry's name was spat out from the goblet, it appears so demeaning. If i were Voldemort, he'd be the first one i'll finish off. forget the fact that 'the dark ass lord' is supposed to only fear the headmaster. NO GOOD!
but other than that, the movie was fantastic. the dragon scenes and underwater shots were well CGed. Tom Felton aka Draco Malfoy is as charming as ever and the touchy scenes were flourishing.
but then again, considering i'm a Pottermania, no matter how badly the movie is made, i would still give it credits. ;)...i agree...i'm biased!
i love Harry Potter...WHOO HOO!!!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THE POTTER FEVER's BACK!! AND IS HERE TO RESIDE!
***********************************************************************
Click here for New York Times Review
No comments:
Post a Comment